Differences between OAuth 2.0 and JWT (JSON Web Token)

Hello guys, both OAuth 2.0 and JWT (JSON Web Tokens) are two widely used authentication and authorization protocols in modern web applications. While both serve similar purposes, there are some key differences between the two that are important to understand, which we will see in this article. This is also an important interview question and if you are preparing for Java and Microservices developer interviews, it's better to know how this two technology works and what are the key differences between then.  In short, OAuth 2.0 is primarily used for authorization, whereas JWT is primarily used for authentication. OAuth 2.0 uses access tokens, whereas JWT is a self-contained token. OAuth 2.0 has a complex authorization flow, whereas JWT has a simple flow. OAuth 2.0 provides better security as it reduces the risk of unauthorized access to protected resources, while JWT can be intercepted if not properly secured. OAuth 2.0 access tokens are short-lived and need to be refreshed periodically, whereas JWTs do not expire.

What is OAuth 2.0 ? Overview

OAuth 2.0 is an authorization protocol that allows a user to grant third-party applications access to their resources without sharing their login credentials. OAuth 2.0 is commonly used in web applications to enable users to sign in with their social media accounts such as Google, Facebook, or Twitter.

OAuth 2.0 operates on a client-server architecture where the client application requests access to a protected resource on behalf of the user. The user is then prompted to authorize the request, and upon successful authorization, the client is granted an access token that it can use to access the protected resource.

JWT (JSON Web Tokens) Overview

JWT (JSON Web Token) is a compact, URL-safe means of representing claims to be transferred between two parties. It is a self-contained token that contains information about the user and their permissions. JWT is commonly used for authentication purposes, and it provides a simple and secure way to transmit data between two parties.

JWT consists of three parts: the header, payload, and signature. The header contains information about the type of token and the encryption algorithm used. The payload contains the user's claims, such as their username, email, and permissions. Finally, the signature is used to verify the authenticity of the token.

Differences between OAuth 2.0 and JWT

One major difference between OAuth 2.0 and JWT is the type of information they carry. OAuth 2.0 access tokens typically contain information about the user and their permissions, whereas JWTs contain a set of claims about the user, such as their name, email address, and other identifying information. This makes JWTs more suitable for authentication purposes.

Another difference is the way they handle authentication. With OAuth 2.0, the user is typically redirected to an authentication server to enter their credentials, and then the server returns an access token. In contrast, JWTs are generated by the server after the user has been authenticated, and then sent to the client as a response to a successful login request.

A key advantage of JWTs over OAuth 2.0 access tokens is that they are self-contained, meaning that all the information needed to verify the user's identity is included in the token itself. This eliminates the need for the client to make additional requests to the server to verify the token, which can improve performance and reduce the risk of security vulnerabilities.

However, this also means that JWTs must be properly secured to prevent them from being intercepted or modified by attackers. This can be done by encrypting the token or by using other security measures such as SSL/TLS.

Another advantage of JWTs is that they can be used for single sign-on (SSO) across multiple applications. Once the user is authenticated and a JWT is issued, the token can be used to access other applications without the need for additional login requests. This can improve user experience and reduce the need for users to remember multiple login credentials.

In summary, both OAuth 2.0 and JWT have their advantages and disadvantages, and choosing which one to use depends on the specific requirements of the application. OAuth 2.0 is better suited for authorization purposes, while JWT is more suitable for authentication. Combining both protocols may provide the best solution in some cases. It's important to properly secure JWTs to prevent them from being intercepted or modified by attackers.

Use Case

OAuth 2.0 is primarily used for authorization, whereas JWT is primarily used for authentication. OAuth 2.0 is used to grant access to a protected resource, such as an API, while JWT is used to authenticate a user and verify their identity.

Token Type

OAuth 2.0 uses access tokens to grant access to protected resources. Access tokens are short-lived, and they expire after a certain amount of time. JWT, on the other hand, is a self-contained token that contains all the necessary information about the user and their permissions. JWTs do not expire, but they can be invalidated by the server.

Authorization Flow

OAuth 2.0 uses a complex authorization flow that involves multiple requests and responses between the client, server, and resource owner. The flow includes steps such as redirecting the user to the authorization server, obtaining authorization from the user, and obtaining an access token from the authorization server.

JWT, on the other hand, does not require a complex authorization flow. Once the user has been authenticated, the server generates a JWT containing the user's claims. The client can then use this JWT to access protected resources.

Security

OAuth 2.0 provides a more secure way of accessing protected resources as it involves obtaining an access token that can be used to access the resource. This reduces the risk of unauthorized access to the protected resource. JWT, on the other hand, can be easily intercepted, so it is essential to implement proper security measures to protect the token.

image course - kaleido

Token Management

OAuth 2.0 access tokens are short-lived, and they expire after a certain amount of time. This requires the client to refresh the access token periodically, which can be cumbersome. JWTs, on the other hand, do not expire, so there is no need to refresh the token.

Conclusion

OAuth 2.0 and JWT are two popular authentication and authorization protocols used in modern web applications. While both serve similar purposes, they have some key differences that are important to understand.

OAuth 2.0 is primarily used for authorization, whereas JWT is primarily used for authentication. OAuth 2.0 uses access tokens, whereas JWT is a self-contained token. OAuth 2.0 has a complex authorization flow, whereas JWT has a simple flow. OAuth 2.0 provides better security as it reduces the risk of unauthorized access to protected resources, while JWT can be intercepted if not properly secured. OAuth 2.0 access tokens are short-lived and need to be refreshed periodically, whereas JWTs do not expire.

In summary, OAuth 2.0 and JWT are both important protocols in modern web applications, and choosing which one to use depends on the use case. If you need to grant access to protected resources, then OAuth 2.0 is the way to go. On the other hand, if you need to authenticate users and verify their identity, then JWT is the better option.

It's worth noting that OAuth 2.0 and JWT are not mutually exclusive. In fact, they can be used together to provide a more secure and efficient authentication and authorization mechanism. For example, you can use OAuth 2.0 to authenticate the user and obtain an access token, and then use JWT to transmit the user's claims securely between the client and server.

In conclusion, understanding the differences between OAuth 2.0 and JWT is crucial for implementing a secure and efficient authentication and authorization mechanism in modern web applications. Choosing the right protocol depends on the use case, and in some cases, combining both protocols may provide the best solution.